发布者认证信息(营业执照和身份证)未完善,请登录后完善信息登录
终于明了MBA考前英语阅读
终于明了MBA考前英语阅读

终于明了MBA考前英语阅读

作者:qxsi   2021-11-24 11:57:01  点击:114

勤学思教育网
未认证 谨防假冒!

详情

  距MBA研究生招生考试越来越近了,小编温馨提醒您的备考时间已经不多啦。在随后的30多天里大家一定要戒骄戒躁好好冲刺呀,不论是综合还是英语都要按照计划有条不紊地进行,调整好自己的备考节奏,不要轻易被别人影响。
  Billionaires are only rarely policy failures
  Bashing billionaires is gaining popularity—especially among candidates to be America’s president. Elizabeth Warren wants to take up to 6% of their wealth in tax every year. Bernie Sanders says they “should not exist”. In Britain’s election, too, the super-rich are under fire. Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the Labour Party, says that a fair society would contain none.
  Left-wingers blasting inequality is nothing new. But the idea that vast personal fortunes are made possible only when government goes wrong is a more novel and serious idea. Facebook and Google dominate online advertising; Warren Buffett likes firms with “moats” that keep rivals out. about a fifth of America’s billionaires made their money in industries in which government capture or market failure is commonplace.
  When capitalism functions well, competition whittles profits away for some but also produces them for others as entrepreneurs seize markets from sleepy incumbents. This process creates vast benefits for society. Between 1948 and 2001, innovators captured only 2% of the value they created. Perhaps that is why billionaires are tolerated even by countries with impeccable social-democratic credentials: Sweden and Norway have more billionaires per person than America does.

相关分类